"The Christian faithful (…) have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church and to make their opinion known to the rest of the Christian faithful". (Code of canon Law Can. 212 §2-3)

"Communication both within the Church community, and between the Church and the world at large, requires openness (…) so as to promote a correctly-informed and discerning public opinion within the Christian community". (Apostolic Letter "The rapid Development" of the Holy Father John Paul II, 2005.1.24 n.12)

Don Gabriele Nanni, the Exorcist

Gabriele Nanni has made it his life’s purpose to destroy Father Andrea and the Armata Bianca”
(Archbishop Mario Peressin to Monsignor Piero Vergari)

From the acquittal of Father Andrea D’Ascanio corresponding to the first ecclesiastical process:

From the records and insofar as has been demonstrated (canon 1608 §2), it is clear that Don Gabriele Nanni is one of the plotters behind the conspiracy against Father Andrea D’Ascanio, for which reason (to avoid a possible act of perjury), the Chief Justice-Investigating Judge did not ask him to swear the de veritate dicenda oath (to state under oath to speak the truth)”.

But, who is Don Gabriele Nanni?

From the acquittal:

Don Gabriele Nanni was born on the 9th of March 1959 in Forlì. After completing his upper secondary education, he entered the diocesan seminary of Bologna, but he abandoned it approximately one year later. He obtained the bachelor’s degree in History of Philosophy in Bologna. After an internal crisis, he once again approached religious practice and wanted to become a priest in a Marian and missionary congregation. In 1987, he met Father Andrea D’Ascanio and became a member of the “Armata Bianca”. In 1990, is moved from Modena to L’Aquila to dedicate himself full-time to the “Armata Bianca” and to obtain his College Diploma in Theology in the Pontifical Lateran University, in virtue of his future ordaining as a priest.

He maintained a series of sentimental episodes with Alessia Zimei. Although he was one of the candidates of the “Armata Bianca” for priesthood (when it was possible), in reality, within him a series of contradictions could be seen that put in doubt his vocation and ideality. Finally, on the occasion of a mission to Moscow (Autumn 1993), carried out at his own initiative and on behalf of the “Armata Bianca” (to study the Russian language, stating that the knowledge of such language would be of great utility for the apostolate in the East), he decided to formally leave the “Armata Bianca” (...).

In fact, in Moscow, he met two nuns from the Pro Deo et Fratribus Congregation (now the Family of Mary), who worked in Novosibirsk in Siberia, and he traveled by air to spend the Christmas season with them. Shortly after, he took the decision to definitively leave the “Armata Bianca” and moved to Slovakia, to the house of theological education of the Pro Deo et Fratribus:

From the acquittal:

Having entered the “Pro Deus et Fratribus” in Slovakia (beginning of March 1994), he remained there until the 13th of December 1994, date on which he moved to the headquarters of “Pro Deo et Fratibus” in Civitella del Tronto (Teramo-I), where he remained until his definitive leaving (towards the end of November 1996). In the “Pro Deo et Fratibus”, they were not sure about his ordination as a priest (...).

His transfer to Civitella del Tronto, a test site, was a deep humiliation for him and he was afraid that there he would be ordained a priest.

He didn’t even think that his superiors had blocked his ordaining, because they perceived that he wasn’t apt for priesthood; on the contrary, he was convinced that everything had been caused by a supposed bad image that had been given of him by Father Andrea D’Ascanio. From then on, a monotony started to incubate until, over time, became a ferocious hate that he transmits to all the women whose “eyes he opens”; from esteeming him, they become strong accusers of Father Andrea D’Ascanio: starting with Alessia Zimei.

The difficult part of his situation becomes known in the house of Zimei family, the nerve center of the “pool” against Father Andrea D’Ascanio. A delegation from L’Aquila went to look for him in Summer 1996 in Civitella del Tronto and hinted at the possibility of entering the seminary of L’Aquila. Bishop Molinari declared himself willing to help him. This is the solution to all his problems.


The first success as "exorcist": the “opening of the eyes” of Alessia Zimei

From the acquittal:

Alessia Zimei was baptized by Father Andrea D’Ascanio and has always had a relationship of trust and friendship with him (…) She joined the Armata Bianca in ’89, at the time of the Special Audience granted by His Holiness John Paul II to the Armata Bianca” in the Paul VI Wing, but her involvement became more intensive shortly afterwards (…) Collaboration with the “Armata Bianca” assumes, without any specific formality, a “vocational” nature of full dedication (on several occasions Alessia signed as “Alessia of God and Mary”). At the start of 1996, Father Andrea D’Ascanio invited Alessia to participate on a mission in Ecuador. There was tough family opposition (…) She returned to L’Aquila from Ecuador on the 31st of October 1996 with the intention of returning to the Latin American country a few days later (15th of November) and continue her mission with the “Armata Bianca” (…)

Alessia Zimei states that, prior to her return from Ecuador, “(her) family had kept in touch with Gabriele Nanni”. Furthermore, she says: “I arrived at Fiumicino airport. I returned from Ecuador on the 31st of October 1996 and I was greeted by my brothers (...). My brothers had a certain hope of “getting me back”, even if the plan was for me to go back to Ecuador in approximately twenty days (...)”. There is moral certainty that the brothers told Alessia of the opportunity to look for Don Gabriele Nanni, who had previously been seen by the family and whose friendship with Alessia is worth noting. In fact, the next day, i.e. on the 1st of November, Alessia called Don Gabriele and fixed a meeting for the 2nd of November, date on which they spent the whole date together (...).

After having spent almost a whole day with him in the Seminar where he lived (“Pro Deo et Fratibus” in Civitella del Tronto TE) on the 2nd of November, the eyes of Alessia were “opened” (…)

After ten hours of psychological pressure, Gabriele Nanni “opened her eyes” and convinced her that Father Andrea was her ruin:

From the questioning of Alessia Zimei before the Ecclesiastical Court:

Chief Justice: When did this occur?

Alessia Zimei: That day, all on the same date, the 2nd of November.

Chief Justice: At the start or end of the day?

Alessia Zimei: No, towards the end, after having talked for hours, because I wasn’t convinced.

She returned to L`Aquila well into the night and assured her family that she would stay away from the Armata Bianca. In fact, she left without even giving the people responsible for the Movement several important documents that the Archbishop of Quito had entrusted to her. She took with her a long list of accusations against Father Andrea D’Ascanio, compiled by Gabriele Nanni, which she should show to Bishop Molinari, who on the 6th of November went to the house of the Zimei family and asks them to prepare a accusation as soon as possible: on the 8th of November he has in his hands a statements signed by Alessia Zimei, a document that will constitute the grounds of the action of the ecclesiastical process filed against Father Andrea D’Ascanio.


Gabriele Nanni returns to L’Aquila

On the 24th of November 1996, Alessia Zimei and Annarita Bellisari went to pick him up from Civitella del Tronto and in the afternoon accompany him to the cathedral of L’Aquila, where Monsignor Molinari is officiating. After Mass, he appeared in the sacristy and the Bishop took him in without excitement, assuring him that he would ordain him as a priest: “I was really happy” –he declared in his testimony to the the Ecclesiastic Court – the same day thrown out of one place and taken in another”.

But he immediately asked him to write a statement against Father Padre Andrea D’Ascanio and, additionally, to look for other accusers. He made him stay in the house of the Zimei family, where he would find the most suitable environment in order to fulfill this mandate. (cfr: 2 – A programmed process).

From the acquittal:

The instrument of such “opening of eyes”, Don Gabriele Nanni, abandoned the Pro Deo et Fratibus and moved to L’Aquila: “I found myself in L’Aquila homeless, in virtue of which they gave me lodgings in the house of the Zimei family”, (...). There, an organization was formed to accuse Father Padre Andrea D’Ascanio, which was recognized (...) by the protagonists at the time of submitting their testimonies. The house of the Zimei family was frequented, with more or less intensity, by Mr. Domenico Pelliccione, Mrs. Pierina Mirka Manfredi, Anna Rita Bellisari, etc.: all ex-members of the “Armata Bianca”. With the collaboration of Alessia, her brothers and Don Gabriele Nanni, several of the accusations were written and tapes containing the verbal statements of Father Andrea were transcribed.

From the questioning of Alessia Zimei before the Ecclesiastical Court:

Chief Justice: Do you think you helped Gabriele Nanni to become a priest?

Alessia Zimei: (...) they threw him out of the Pro Deo. He didn’t know where to go and... I talked about him” (“I recommended him”, she said in the first version), with Monsignor Molinari.

From the questioning of Annarita Bellisari before the Ecclesiastical Court:

Then Molinari came to my house(...) and I talked to him about him on the 23rd of November and Gabriele was accepted by Molinari, because basically he had been fired by the Pro Deo in the morning, then he went to L’Aquila, where he was taken in by Molinari and sent for lodging to the house of the Zimei family”.

From the acquittal:

Monsignor Molinari, who didn’t know him, but knew of him through Alessia, took him under his direct protection in virtue of a not far off priesthood ordainment: Don Gabrielle became his driver and spiritual son (...)”.

Why was Don Gabriele thrown out of the Pro Deo?

From the letter of his Excellence, Monsignor Paolo Hnilica, to Father Andrea D’Ascanio:

He left the community because we gave him the following choice: either he stayed in our missionary community, leaving Father Andrea alone, because we believe in his integrity and in the marvelous mission of the Armata Bianca; or he left our community”.


He immediately went into action

Not even 24 hours had passed when Nanni got in touch with Mirka Pierina Manfredi from Modena, another old acquaintance of his, who Father Andrea D’Ascanio had helped to complete her studies and to place her as a professor, and she immediately declared herself ready for the second accusation:

From the questioning of Pierina Manfredi before the Ecclesiastical Court:

I decided to write the accusation, after having received a telephone call from Gabriele Nanni, in which he explained to me how Monsignor Molinari was compiling testimonies to expose and bring Father Andrea to public light. I wrote to him that same afternoon he called me, the 24th of November 1996, I think that I then sent it by mail to Alessia Zimei, but I’m not sure.”

Two days later, the 26th of November, Nanni submitted his first accusation against Father Andrea with Monsignor Molinari, but he asked him to make another, more consistent one and encouraged him to get moving to obtain more testimonies against him: this is how the second accusation took shape, which, the aforementioned Bishop sent to Rome, together with a letter of presentation:

Taken from the minute that contains the interrogatory of Gabriele Nanni before the court of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith:

Chief Justice: His (Nanni) second accusation was received in the CDF on the 7th of March 1997, therefore, it is prior to that date. Monsignor Molinari writes in it: “This text was written by Nanni, because I asked him to”.

During the subsequent days, Gabriele Nanni will make Anna Rita Bellisari and an Albanian woman, who had recently arrived in Italy sign accusations against Father Andrea D’Ascanio. It was then that, in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, sufficient elements existed to activate the first process.


Deacon and priest

Gabriele Nanni, after staying three months in the house of the Zimei family and having filed the other requested complaints with the Bishop, he was sent to the Sassa parish priest (AQ). Two months later he was ordained deacon and officially entered in the diocese. Five months later, on the 30th of August 1997, he is ordained a priest.


With what spirit is someone prepared to be ordained a Deacon, the last step on the ladder before priesthood?

From the statement by Monsignor Molinari to the the Ecclesiastic Court:

- “Then (the 30th of March 1997, writer’s note) I said to Don Gabriele “what do you say? Shall I ordain you tomorrow or shall we wait?” and he replied “if we let this occasion pass, this opportunity might not present itself again in the future”. I ordained him...later, Monsignor Peressin told me: “You betrayed me, I’m going to write to Rome. I’ll have that ordainment annulled...”

Well aware of deceiving the Archbishop, on the 31st of March 1997, he had him ordained deacon, a few hours in advance, taking advantage of that “occasion” that might not “present itself in the future”. Monsignor Mario Peressin mentions this ordainment in the letter he sent to Cardinal Ratzinger on the 24th of June 1997:

Many doubts arise in my mind about the intention and true vocation of Deacon Gabriele Nanni... maybe this man Nanni is the key to understanding all the recent difficulties suffered by Father Andrea and the Armata Bianca. It would seem that it is precisely Nanni who spins the webs of his opponents”.


With what spirit is someone prepared to be ordained a Priest? He says it himself on the 2nd of March 1999, in the statements he made before the Ecclesiastic Court:

I didn’t want to be ordained, I told Monsignor Molinari, and he asked me several times to let him take care of it. I did it, obeying Monsignor Molinari and out of devotion.”

The legitimate doubt arises about the validity of the ordainment as priest of Gabriele Nanni, a doubt supported by the Code of Canonic Law:

Canon 1026: “Whoever is ordained should enjoy the due freedom; it is not at all legal to force someone, in any way and for any reason, to receive their habit”.

Gabriele Nanni stated that “he didn’t want to”, the obedience due to the Bishop is a heavy “moral burden”. What does it mean to do something “out of devotion”? Devotion to whom?

Canon 1029: “Only those who (...) are motivated by a correct intention will be promoted to ordainment”.

The “intention” with which Gabriele Nanni passed to the dioceses of L’Aquila is that stated to his Superiors of the Pro Deo:

...he said that he had, consciously, to go to L’Aquila to accuse Father Andrea D’Ascanio, because he is possessed and a danger to the Church” (from the letter of His Excellence, Monsignor Paolo Hnilica to Father Andrea D’Ascanio).

But, in his last letter written in Slovakia, dated the 13th of May 1994, addressed to Father Andrea D’Ascanio with these statements:

I am infinitely grateful to you...I really have no way of paying you back for everything you have done for me, other than stating my acknowledgement and remembering you in my daily prayers. Affectionately yours, Gabriele”.

Based on what elements and there being no contact whatsoever with him, can he now declare him “possessed and a danger to the Church”?

Don Gabriele Nanni, on the road to priesthood that he has taken has not conducted himself with a “correct intention”: in order to safe himself, he doesn’t hesitate to morally assassinate a priest or attack a Work of Mary well-seen by dozens of Cardinals and Bishops and even by His Holiness, John Paul II, who in a unique act, granted an audience to 10,000 children from the Armata Bianca, which by the way has been the biggest audience, reserved exclusively for children, that has taken place in the entire history of the Church.


“Canon” of the cathedral

After three and a half years, on the 5th of February 2001, Monsignor Giuseppe Molinari named him canon of the cathedral, an honorific position that is granted only “to priests who are distinguished by their doctrine and by the integrity with which they conduct their lives and, furthermore, because they have honorably exercised the Ministry” (canon 509 of the Code of Canonic Law).


“ The Exorcist”

The Internet is full of sites that talks about Don Gabriele Nanni as an exorcist or, rather, trainer of exorcists.

What is an exorcist?

An exorcist in the Catholic Church is a priest who releases people who have been possessed from the power of the devil.

Who is the devil? The personification of hate and lies, as it is the opposite of God, who is Live and Truth: Jesus calls him “murderer from the beginning… father of lies” (John 8:44).

The most authentic person “possessed” by the devil is one who has the heart loaded with hate and who discharges it against their brother" (“Who hates his brother is a murderer”- 1 John 3:15) sometimes physically beating him, in most cases with the slander that is the fruit of lies.

We can see – in four testified and sworn cases – the fruit harvested by Gabriele Nanni with his exorcisms. The first one is that carried out on Alessia Zimei on the 2nd of November 1996: after ten hours of discussion (“after we talked for hours, I wasn’t convinced” says Zimei) the “exorcist” wins his battle: he takes Love from Alessia’s heart and fills it will merciless hate, making her the most tenacious hater of Father Andrea. He does the same thing with the other testimonies in the statements based on which the process will be implemented.

Case 1. Alessia Zimei:

This “release” leaves all those who a few days earlier frequented her for months during the mission in Ecuador, disoriented and perplexed.

From the statement of His Eminence, Cardinal Bernardino Echeverria Ruiz, Archbishop emeritus of Guayaquil:

I state that on the 12th of November 1996, I came across Alessia Zimei, with brother Francesco, in the General Hose of the Minor Fathers in Roma, which is located at Via Santa Maria Mediatrice No. 25. She told me that she wanted to accuse Father Andrea and the Armata Bianca before the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and that to this effect she would go to see Cardinal Sodano. I tried to dissuade her, reminding her how much she had collaborated with this Marian movement and the great affection she had always shown for Father Andrea. I found her unmovable and it seemed strange to me that in just a few days she could undergo such a drastic change, and stranger still that she was heading to the Cardinal Secretary of State, who has nothing to do with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. A few days after the event, I came across Father Andrea and I told him what had happened. I told him that he had to remain strong, because it was only a test, for him and his work, dearly cherished by Pious Father of Pietrelcina”.Cardinal Bernardino Echeverria Ruiz. OFM.

From the submitted testimony, under penalty of perjury, by Patricia Puccini to the Archbishop of Guayaquil (Ecuador) at the request of the Chief Justice of the Ecclesiastical Church:

To her, the Armata Bianca was everything, she formed part of the movement since she was small (...). I was happy when I heard her talk about the Armata and above all I was excited to see the profound respect and love with which she always spoke about Father Andrea and his work. She called him “My pa’”, because she said that to her, he was like another father”.

See this last letter, which Father Andrea received from Alessia Zimei during her stay in Ecuador, dated the 2nd of October 1996:

Dear Father, I would like to tell you that today’s meeting went wonderfully. The reading of the fax you sent was comforting for everyone. Everyone was very happy (...). Today, whilst I was playing about with the calculator, I counted how many children I had found by myself. Guess how many? 28,682 (...) A very big hug, as strong as the one we have each other at the airport. Alessia”.

Case 2 Mirka Pierina Manfredi

The effect of this second exorcism is immediate, he “opened the eyes” after a telephone call with Gabriele Nanni (24th of November 1996), as can be seen from the accusation filed with the Ecclesiastic Court:

Not long ago, I wrote to thank-you letters to Father Andrea (...), today I accuse Father Andrea of plagiarism”.

Case 3. Anna Rita Bellisari

From her testimony to the Ecclesiastic Court:

On the 3rd of November, Gabriele Nanni, by means of a telephone call that lasted two and a half hours, started to open my eyes”.

Case 4. Rosa Pelliccione. From the interrogatory made of Miss Maria Gabriella Pelliccione:

My father took her (her mother) immediately with Gabriele, so was his impetus that he also wanted to take me; he has insisted on several occasions: “Lella, go and see Don Gabriele, he will help you to open your eyes, to understand”. He didn’t tell me that my mother had already been or that she had had her eyes opened...”

When the same phenomenon is repeated many times, under the same conditions, it gains scientific validity. The true exorcising power of Don Gabriele Nanni is the removal of Love from the hearts of the people he “exorcises” and filling them with hate: removing Truth from their mind and replacing it with Lies.

These testimonies were considered false and unreliable by the Judges who heard father Andrea D'Ascanio.


The true face of Gabriele Nanni

From the acquittal:

About the character, most intimate and deep feelings of Don Gabriele Nanni, there is a handwritten document of his, which was sent to Father Andrea D’Ascanio when Don Gabriele was still in the Armata Bianca (2nd of September 1992, process record No. 116, attached). (...) Don Gabriele Nanni said about himself (the comments are superfluous).”


I deeply wish to assert myself; exercising a subtle, fascinating power over people and creating dependence; achieving an institutional power capable of altering and structuring at my pleasure, the reality as much as possible.

I want to be loved, to have a place in the heart of others, if it’s the first place, all the better. As I never liked violence of plagiarism, because they do not define a sincere or true veneration, I look for the way of getting all this, making me loved because of what I am: obviously you have to be as perfect as possible: the impossible part of this “reality” should be to clearly convince others, per se. This perfection of being per se obviously excludes a road, a maturing, because the being is.

If at one time I thought that what dominates the whole is the only synthetic activity, i.e., philosophy, I have later discovered that the spirit, particularly if it is joined to that which is the Only One, True One and more than powerful. I then took a path to e able to enter and discover secrets, to be able to empower myself and with those be able to exercise that activity of synthesis of reality and its governing.

God can be a rival, rather than an aid, because he remains far away. My cross is formed by the inability to obtain the extraordinary powers of God.

On a daily basis, the cross manifests itself, obviously, when what I do doesn’t seem to correspond to a higher dignity. Everything I do, I do because I hope that in the future things will change. (...)

What I am searching for is not an ecclesiastical charge (if one comes along, well, all the better), but rather a spiritual charge with which an unlimited power can be exercised. It would be dishonest if I omitted as well a real, albeit strange, desire for purification. But in the end the wish for purification made by myself, or by God, remains, by the mere desire to be how I want, to be myself.

As I have said, I’m not interested in imposing myself on others with lies or camouflage. I have the ambition to be perfect to be the god of others (God is so great that I hope that he makes a bit of space for me).

Delirium? With an examination of reality, the answer is yes. But I know that, paradoxically, with the spirit there are no limits, confines, obstacles and anything is possible. I think that this may be demonic. An awareness of what the demon is, is clear to me, because we think the same things, deceiving ourselves with the idea that we act for the best, better than God; or, notwithstanding him.

It is the time to ask myself and state which side I will take. I know perfectly well that there is no chance of a third way and that these desires would burn me in any case.

If I didn’t choose God, I wouldn’t support the inertia and mediocrity. On the other hand, it’s like having a gun without a stock. In the case that I found it or it was given to me, I would go on the attack, and I am sure, if not in the service of God, it would be against God in an unsupportable, unsupportable impulse to exercise power. (...)

In short, mine is not a “holy” vocation; my desire is not serve God, but rather myself.


From the acquittal:

This self-denouncement, which could have been used for a profound conversion, is important and is still very current, considering the way in which Don Gabriele Nanni behaves, this is the cause”.

Profile of Don Gabriele prepared by a psychologist:

From the letter written by Andrea Alfonsi, psychologist, to Father Andrea D’Ascanio, which is in the records of the ecclesiastic process:

“Dear Father Andrea...

I feel the duty to give you an opinion, I think a little too objective, about the person of Gabriele Nanni, Alessia Zimei and Annarita Bellisari.

They are individuals who, especially Gabriele, as you well know, I have had the opportunity to get to know in detail, continuously frequenting them (in the case of Gabriele, even sharing a roof in the same house) and sharing with them all the difficulties, but also the joys, that life in L’Aquila offers us day by day.

The sense of this letter is very simple and I can summarize it in a single, maybe slightly bitter, phrase, but clear and not at all exaggerated: “I am not at all surprised that people like Gabriele, Alessia and Annarita can, with an absolute lack of concern and forgetting any good feeling that linked them to you, level a violent and absolutely unjustified hate against you”. This may be news to you...

One of the first phrases that Gabriele said to me comes to mind: “Father Andrea has more qualities that Jesus Christ! And, furthermore: “Father Andrea does not have a definable character, it is impossible to pigeon-hole him according to human criteria”.

The digressions of this type alternated, inclusively during the course of a single day, with the lowest and violent accusations in his relations, which always arose when one of his dreams of greatness was broken (I’m talking about Gabriele). The illusions of Gabrielle found an appearance of reality in his adhesion to a person like you, with whom, according to what Gabriele himself says, God in First Person was playing with the fate of the world.

His aspirations to priesthood did not go well with the attitude he had regarding the life itself for which he expected complete recognition... His aspirations didn’t even stop at priesthood! He surely aspired to the Episcopate, he said: “To have the plenitude of the Sacrament”, I corrected him and said: “to have plenitude of yourself”...

His adhesion to the Armata Bianca was a narcissist adhesion (pardon the psychological technical term) towards the person of Father Andrea who should have been his trampoline...He wanted Bishops as powerful friends, gifts of Highness, power and glory.

Poor Gabriele, with his dreams destroyed, poor eternal adolescent in love with himself to the point of deceiving himself about the reasons for what he does. What he is doing now, under the façade of zealousness to unveil an apparent truth, hides a revenge against whoever was not at the height of his insatiable desires, or the architect thereof, nor a tacit collaborator or in agreement with them.

I went to look for him at the Civitella training house, where he took refuge, escaping from L’Aquila: he said that he was very well, but on the contrary, he “exploded” and got even more tangled up in his web of passions. Now he is in the miserable condition of someone who has made a life based on lies, lies that not even he himself is saved from.

Gabriele is that: an explosive mixture of immaturity, imbalance, great ambition, resentfulness and incubated and fed hate, disordered passion”.

Profile of Gabriele prepared by an ex-fellow student of his:

Regarding Gabriele, I observed this: he moves on from moments of a sincere search for God and divine things to moments of confused investigation of himself and his own realization.

On several occasions, when he tried to make his ego die, he has attempted to destroy anyone who opposes him, more than himself.

He exercises great fascination among women, but above he loves to see someone suffering from this fascination.

He passes from moments of esteeming someone, even looking for them frequently, to moments of rejection of the presence of the same person, being capable of morally and, if possible, even physically attacking them. I have had to go through this sort of thing...” (Testimony of Paola Cirillo, Modena).


The “exorcist” continues his slanderous activity

The statements by Archbishop Mario Peressin to Monsignor Piero Vergari takes on greater significance: “Gabriele Nanni has made the destruction of Father Andrea and of the Armata Bianca his life’s aims”.

After 13 years, Don Gabriele Nanni continues his slanderous activity anywhere in the world where he appears in virtue of his “career” as an exorcist, with bigger and bigger lies, and more and more serious slander. Hate is difficult to overcome if it is strengthened over time.

But hate is not compatible with Priesthood.

The International Committee in Favor of Father Andrea D’Ascanio advises Don Gabriele Nanni to seriously reconsider his ordainment as priest, which he “didn’t want” and which he did not receive having a “correct intention”.

The International Committe in favour of Father Andrea D'Ascanio intends to reveal to the world the other face of ecclesiastic justice.